Cambodian Older Foreigner Marriage Ban Lifted?

[ladislav]

Marriage ban for older foreign guys lifted in Cambodia?

Cambodia passed a law in 2011 forbidding foreign men over 50 from getting married to Cambodians. Apparently now, it has been repealed.

But a foreigner still needs to show that he 's making USD 2500 a month at least.

https://www.embassyofcambodiadc.org/blo ... Fm8AtdRYpg

[Moretorque]

Just goes to show you money rules the world, I guess this is why the Jews have monpolized the worlds money system.....

[MrMan]

Just goes to show you money rules the world, I guess this is why the Jews have monpolized the worlds money system.....

What a jump-- from a marriage ban on older men marrying Cambodian women to Jews and the world money system.

[ladislav]

Not many Jews are in Cambodia looking to marry " shiksas".

Israel is a socialist country heavily dependent on aid and the average income of an average Israeli is lower than that of an average American.

Biggest bank in the USA is JP Morgan Chase run by Messrs Dimon and Harrison, not Lipshitz and Rosenberg.

And the money supply now is in the hands of the Chinese, not Jews. These are taking over here.

Not one Jew, not one Israeli is doing anything seriously financial here.

Jews did monopolize some money in Europe in the 19- 20 centuries, and some-- in the USA, but the big money is in the hands of the WASPs, the Saudis and the Chinese. The biggest banks are now Chinese.

Or are these Jews squinting?

[Moretorque]

I just wanted to see if I could get you to respond, thanks for the information on Cambodia. I have come to the conclusion there are treaties that go back centuries that run everything and the people who are sitting on these treaties are the ones who set this entire world wide system up.

Who put China together ? the West did..

[Winston]

Cambodia is a cheap country. One can live well there on 500 dollars a month. So what's the logic of needing 2500 a month to get married? There's no sense in that. Marriage should not only be for the rich. Cambodian men don't need to make anything. So this is discrimination and would never be possible in America.

[ladislav]

I just wanted to see if I could get you to respond, thanks for the information on Cambodia. I have come to the conclusion there are treaties that go back centuries that run everything and the people who are sitting on these treaties are the ones who set this entire world wide system up.

Who put China together ? the West did..

This is an opinion. The Chinese may or may not agree with it.

[MrMan]

Cambodia is a cheap country. One can live well there on 500 dollars a month. So what's the logic of needing 2500 a month to get married? There's no sense in that. Marriage should not only be for the rich. Cambodian men don't need to make anything. So this is discrimination and would never be possible in America.

In Indonesia, vendors in the traditional marketplace will charge foreigners high prices. My wife and I would pretend we did not know each other in the market so the vendors would not charge up the prices. Way back when I offered a certain amount for carrots, maybe 2000. The vendor would not sell them to me for less than 5000, even though I went up to 2500. My wife got them for 2000. It's actually irrational, economically/financially, but they don't want to feel like they lose. A white friend of mine would say, "Poor white man wants discount" which is funny but works a lot better grammatically in Indonesian than when translated. They say vendors charge one price for relatives, another for people from their village, another fro people from their people-group, another for Indonesians, and another for foreigners.

I saw a documentary about a man who objected to his university accepting Nike sponsorship because they subcontracted to factories that paid low wages. He went to a poor neighborhood in Indonesia with another student who both tried to live off the salary the factories offered. His friend had to choose between eating and Panadol when she was sick. The problem with his experiment was that he would have had to pay white-man prices if he shopped in the market and was not able to get the deals the locals would. They probably had a tough time eeking out a living, but he did not seem to favor in the price premium he had to pay and the fact that some of the other families may have combined incomes in one household.

If Cambodia has a lot of traditional markets, an expat may need to make more than a local. it is also necessary to make more if you ever want to save up for a ticket. And if you get sick of rice after a while and you want to go eat a plate of pasta or a steak at a hotel, then you need the extra cash for that that a local does not need. Locals may not need toilet paper in their budget either.

[flowerthief00]

Something is terribly amiss in a country when a single law discriminates on the basis of nationality AND income AND gender AND age all at the same time.

This country is now off my list of places to even visit. I wasn't interested in marriage anywhere whatsoever, but if their sense of fairness/justice/decency is off by this much I can only imagine what else must be wrong in their system.

[Cornfed]

Locals may not need toilet paper in their budget either.

They don't because they have hoses for that, which is obviously the best solution. Why has this idea not caught on in the West?

[MrMan]

Locals may not need toilet paper in their budget either.

They don't because they have hoses for that, which is obviously the best solution. Why has this idea not caught on in the West?

We went with the dirty behind option over the dirty hand option.

[MrMan]

Locals may not need toilet paper in their budget either.

They don't because they have hoses for that, which is obviously the best solution. Why has this idea not caught on in the West?

We went with the dirty behind option over the dirty hand option.

It is nice to have both. I might have to install some if I buy a place here soon.

[Cornfed]

Locals may not need toilet paper in their budget either.

They don't because they have hoses for that, which is obviously the best solution. Why has this idea not caught on in the West?

We went with the dirty behind option over the dirty hand option.

Gross, but a squirt of water could solve this problem.